Notes from the pre-semester SLO meeting of January 19, 2021

The Short Version

Here’s a list of the most important stuff that we discussed. If you want more information about any of the discussions, scroll down below and read the section on that issue.

  • Please encourage students to use the Writing and Language Development Center (WLDC). Kiara sent an email (which I forwarded on Tuesday) with ideas for ways to do this.
  • The English Department voted to pilot SLO reporting in eLumen. This will be very different from past semesters: instead of reporting collecting information to me through a Google Form, we’ll report SLOs for each individual student through eLumen.
  • Adjustments to the Spring schedule have been completed, for the most part, though of course there is always that chance that courses may be cancelled for continued low enrollment.
  • My recommendations for the Fall schedule were accepted, with a couple exceptions.
  • Early in the semester, I’ll request feedback re: adding “Broadcast” to the DE addenda for ENGL 1E and 56.
  • Woodland’s and our request to meet with the deans to discuss lowering composition course caps is on hold while the deans wait for the District to discuss policies around course caps more generally.
  • As comp coordinator, I’ll be working on two main projects over this semester. If you have any insights or thoughts on any of these, please let me know:
    • Rotation for our literature classes
    • English Department Employee Handbook

I also have three issues I’ll be tracking. (I do not have a “longer version” for any of these because there isn’t anything to say yet.)

  • Only 4 units of our 5-unit ENGL 1E are transferrable. I’m not sure what that means for our students at this point, so I need to follow up on that.
  • We’re waiting to hear if our Academic Senate will vote to support Yuba College becoming part of the state’s Online Consortium.
  • CSU has added a multicultural requirement (Area F). I don’t yet know how, if at all, that affects our Program Maps or our degrees.

If you have any questions about anything listed above, please read the longer version below. And if you still have questions, or if you have questions about anything not on the list, then please let me know.

The Longer Versions

WLDC

It would be helpful to really push our students to use the Writing and Language Development Center. Kiara sent an email (December 18, Subject: WLDC Reminders!), which I forwarded on Tuesday. Kiara also updated links and attached a flyer in a response to that message on Tuesday as well. (If you can’t find the email thread, let me know, and I’ll forward it to you.)

Aside from how students benefit from the WLDC, there are two important reasons to encourage students to use it:

First: Students are using NetTutor (or however it’s spelled) rather than the WLDC. (50% of our students’ NetTutor visits involved English tutoring.) This is true even though most of us have disabled NetTutor in our Canvas shells (if you haven’t, please do!) because students are going in through other courses and then submitting their English requests from there.

NetTutor provides far inferior tutoring services for English — much more grammar focused, less interactive, more “fixing” the paper rather than training students how to think about revision, and so on.

And second: the WLDC has been sort of under attack by some administrators, and if our students don’t use the center, it’s easier for administration to argue that it’s not as important as we know it is. This frustrates me, of course; looking at any numbers under pandemic conditions is a big problem, as I see it. But that’s where we are.

So please: encourage your students to use the WLDC. And (as I said) refer to Kiara’s email, which includes several specific ways that we can do this.

eLumen pilot for SLOs

eLumen is the program that is replacing TracDat (where we recorded Program Review and SLO assessment data) and CurricuNET (our curriculum software). Shawn asked that the English department pilot SLO reporting in eLumen, and the department agreed to do so (10 yes, 5 no-opinion, 2 no).

This means that all English faculty (full- and part-time) will report SLOs on each student, rather than (as we’ve done in the past) simply reporting the numbers of students who fell into each category. We’ll have more information as we move forward — Shawn and I have some work to do to develop an assessment rubric, and we’ll need to provide training. (It’s not hard, but it will be different, and will likely take a little more time.)

Related, but not identical: at an eLumen workshop, I learned that the integration between Canvas and eLumen is pretty limited. There is a way to set things up so that the assessment on a single assignment will automatically transfer SLO assessment scores into eLumen. But we, as a department, have some decisions to make, some of which might make that automation unhelpful.

More as we go.

Spring and Fall schedules

Don said that most, if not all, of the adjustments to the Spring schedule (specifically, cancelling classes and bumping to make sure full-timers have their contractually required load, or close to it) had been completed. This doesn’t mean that there will be no more changes — things might not go as predicted. But he is not expecting a “second round” of changes, just unexpected adjustments.

For the Fall, I was originally asked to created a normal schedule, but then the school decided it would put together a schedule that is roughly 50% live and 50% online. I adjusted by requesting a handful of hybrid courses (more on that in a moment) and shifting a handful of others online. The changes weren’t huge.

For hybrid courses, I created enough for the people who expressed explicit interest in exploring the mode. However, since some of those people are part-time faculty, and my ability to assign classes to them is contingent on seniority and return rights, there’s a possibility that a course or two may end up on the plate of someone who said they’d do it if they have to. I will know more later.

In most cases, the requests re: literature courses were accepted as recommended. The two exceptions: ENGL 40B (our follow-up tutor course) isn’t going to be allowed to run (though Brian J and I have requested a meeting to argue that this decision be reconsidered), and ENGL 34 was moved online (inexplicably, as far as I’m concerned, since it’s a late start class and thus gives maximum time for the vaccines to have an effect, etc.)

ENGL 1E and 56 DE Addenda

We decided that ENGL 1E and 56 should not be offered online except in emergencies, and we made sure our DE addenda reflected that. However, “except in emergencies” relies on the state declaring an emergency, which means we have no flexibility to move 1E or 56 online if the campus closes. And that’s a problem for students who need (or want) those courses.

So I am going to recommend that we revise the DE Addenda for these two classes to allow “Broadcast” as a modality. This would mean we would be allowed to offer the course online, but only synchronously — that is, the instructor would teach it over Zoom, but at the same times that it was scheduled for face-to-face.

The idea is always to schedule the course face-to-face, but to have the option to shift it to broadcast if that becomes necessary. The alternative, unless the state announces that we’re in what they consider an emergency, is to cancel the course. (Or, as is the case this semester, not to offer it at all.)

I’ll run a poll/survey sometime once the semester has settled in a bit.

Class Size Discussion

Last semester, Brian Jukes and I met with Aree Metz and Kevin Ferns from Woodland to develop a request and rationale for lowering class sizes in composition courses. We sent the two relevant deans a request to schedule a meeting, but were told that the VPs and the District are working to develop a process for reviewing course sizes, and the deans would like clarity from that discussion before they meet with us.

I (and I’m sure I’m not alone on this) am not content to just sit around waiting, but that was at the very end of the last semester, and we haven’t yet discussed what our next steps will be. I’ll let everyone know when we’ve decided on our next steps.

My projects for the semester

In addition to things mentioned above, I plan to work on a couple projects this semester.

First, early in the semester, I would like us to finalize a course rotation plan for our lit courses. We now have more lit courses than we have slots for a two-year rotation, and we’ve run into a couple semesters where our rotation conflicted with Woodland’s. I’ll develop a draft and get feedback within the first few weeks of school.

Second, I hope to begin putting together a sort-of “Employee Handbook” for English, as a resource for all of us, but especially for new faculty. I’ll likely build it in an English Dept. Canvas shell, which could also serve as a place to discuss issues asynchronously and/or share resources. (We’ve wanted that for a long time, and even started dumping things in a shell, but it’s kind of disorganized.)

If you have anything that you wish you knew or had known — policies, answers to questions, etc., either now or back when you were still new at the college — let me know so I can include it in the handbook.

Virtual Hallway and Virtual Happy Hour

This is a combined and abridged version of emails I sent out explaining the what and why of these virtual meetings.

I’ve set up two weekly ConferZoom meetings for anyone who wants to drop in, say “hi,” and shoot the breeze.

And when I say “shoot the breeze,” I mean it. No agenda, nothing planned. We can talk about anything–work, of course, but also how much we miss each other, what we’re doing to stay sane, what we’re reading, how we’re feeling, etc. It’s just an opportunity for us to see each other and keep connected, however inadequately.

Here’s the information:

  • Virtual Hallways: Mondays at 1:00
  • Virtual Happy Hour: Fridays at 4:00

I’ve scheduled enough meetings to get us through the end of the semester. At least one may need to be rescheduled, as it’s the same day as commencement–but we’ll see what the district decides to do about the ceremony.

I didn’t list the links here because I want to prevent Zoombombing. I’ll try to send out a reminder email with a link to the Zoom on each scheduled day. If I forget, though, you can find both links in my March 24 email (Subject: “English faculty: Virtual Happy Hour (and Virtual Hallway, redux”).

Please don’t feel any obligation to join. It’s meant to be a respite, not one more thing on top of everything else. Also, don’t feel obligated to stay the whole time — drop in when you can, leave when you have to. And don’t feel obligated to be on camera–we even had one person who didn’t have a mic, and so typed in the chat window. It was still good to connect.

Notes from the English Dept. meeting of Jan 21, 2020

WLDC Announcements

  • Please see the email that Shawn sent out last week, which explains why it’s a good idea to take your class in to visit the Writing and Language Development Center. (She sent it Jan 21; it was a reply to my email, so the subject line should read “Reminder: English Department meeting Tuesday.”)
  • The email also includes an attached homework assignment that Shawn uses, based on assignments from Katie Oesau and Brian Jukes, which requires students to get feedback from the WLDC before turning in an essay.
  • The WLDC also offers tutoring for online students. For more information about that, see the email from Kiara Koenig (date: Jan 22, Subject: “re: Online Tutoring support (for students taking online English classes only”). It includes an explanation of what’s offered, and a couple examples of language used in online courses to introduce the support services.
  • Kiara sent a second email about the WLDC more generally, with a couple additional ways to promote and incorporated the WLDC into your courses (date: Jan 22, Subject: “More ways to Promote & Incorporate the WLDC).

PSLO Work Reminder

Full-time faculty: Remember that a draft Program-level SLO is due for discussion at the Feb 18 department meeting. We agreed to develop 5 SLOs, with the following faculty attached to each:

  • Rhetorical choices – Cassandra, Shawn
  • Critical reading – Greg
  • Writing process – Jukes
  • Writing as art; appreciation – Zack
  • Traditions – Carrie, Kiara

If you’re a part-timer and would like to join in, please contact the person(s) attached to the SLO that interests you. (Condrey and Kyra–feel free to attach yourself to one as well.)

Summer schedule update

Since the meeting, I’ve moved on to contacting part-timers who have return rights. It’s still in process–it’s a short list of classes, but it’s still a bit of a jigsaw. I’ll be out of town for the next couple of days, but I hope to finish and turn it in early next week.

Curriculum updates

  • ENGL 1E (the replacement for the co-req 1A + 10) is being offered for Fall 2020. There are still a few questions to clear up around general education and transfer. More to follow on that.
  • ENGL 1B has been launched. (For those who don’t remember: we chose to keep the Course Outline of Record the same, and to change the number of units to 4. For more information on that, search in your email for a message from me (Date: 11/22/19; Subject: “English faculty: important ENGL 1B survey, redux). Obviously, the survey is no longer active, but the information about why we had to make a decision is there.
  • As far as I can tell, only two courses have yet to be launched, in our process of updating curriculum every 5 (?) years. Condrey is working on them.
  • Carrie and I will meet to talk through the issues around whether or not we should reconsider our local English AA degree. On the one hand, it’s very close to the AA-T now (with the 1B change), so we’ll probably need to justify it. On the other hand, some of the options we wanted to offer our students (e.g., different “paths” toward publication, literature, or composition) may be precluded by the AA-T degree. We’ll figure out the situation and bring a clear explanation to the department.
  • A moratorium [I just learned that I don’t know how to spell that word…] on curriculum begins March 2, which is why we’re working to get as much of this done quickly. We’ll be able to look at, but not launch or revise, anything in curriculum through at least the rest of the semester, and probably the summer. Training on the new system should happen during convocation week in fall. (Fingers crossed… the last three-month moratorium took something like a year and a half….)

Professional development

This semester, no one is taking on an official position of coordinating the same type of Teaching Community that we had last semester. Part of it is time (stipends don’t generate time); part of it is the complexity of finding a time when a maximal number of folk can attend. So, instead, we’re exploring two things:

  • Shawn is going to run a book club, reading Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain. Shawn will be in touch with more information–the extent to which it will be face-to-face or online, etc. We’re also going to try to use funds we have in a Foundation account to pay for the book for interested part-time faculty. Again, watch for a communique from Shawn.
  • Kiara may organize a “Partnership Plus” program, which will pair faculty together for small study-group partnerships (two? three?). These will be flexible, but there will be requirements (e.g., an inquiry topic, a report in a larger group setting toward the end of the semester) so that we can offer stipends to part-time faculty.

Note that I may have misconstrued some details on these. Please don’t hold Shawn or Kiara to anything I’ve written here; I’m just offering my best recollection of the discussion. They’re in charge of the details.

SLO Comments

The last question of the SLO reporting survey asks for comments or suggestions. I collected those comments on this document, in case there’s anything we want to discuss.

[Update: I forgot this on first draft] We determined (last semester) that students who do not participate in the assessment should not be included in the SLO results. I will work to make sure this is made clear for the next SLO reporting survey.

Future agenda items

I created a board where I’ll collect and organize upcoming agenda items. Feel free to drop in and take a look and, if you notice anything missing, or have something you’d like to add, let me know. I’ll try to keep it updated.

You may, of course, click on that link. But if you’re not on this page, I made a reasonably memorable bitly link that you can use: bit.ly/yce-agenda

(yce = Yuba College English, in case you wondered…)

On pass rates and academic standards

The English Department has heard that at least one school is scrutinizing pass rates of individual instructors in their composition classes. I’m not sure which school this is, and I don’t know how accurate the description of the college’s practice is–ah, hearsay!–but the department asked me to make our position clear.

The Yuba College English Department opposes any process that would pressure faculty — full- or part-time — to maintain, or meet, any kind of a pass-rate target.

There are a couple subtleties here:

First, we are not saying that we won’t examine pass rates in aggregate as a way to judge, for example, what additional or improved support we may need to offer our students. But we will not examine the pass rates of individual faculty. Pass rates won’t be used to single out instructors, especially for evaluations and/or rehiring decisions.

Second, we are also not saying that we have the authority to make sure that something like this would never happen at Yuba. There are processes whereby the college administration (and/or other faculty) could overrule us. But we are committed to bringing all our departmental (as well as Senate and union) muscle to bear to resist any such move. And our institutional muscle is fairly well developed.

To be clear: in all the college-wide, and even district-wide, discussions around the changes wrought by AB 705, I have never heard even a hint that anyone would want to call for this. Everyone, from the Board of Trustees on down, has been explicit in their support for maintaining academic standards. I’m writing this clarification simply because I have heard concerns raised in response to practices elsewhere. And we want to put our instructors’ minds at ease.

The reason for our position is probably obvious: it’s easy enough to improve pass rates, if we’re willing to lower our academic standards. But that is, in fact, our greatest fear about AB 705 — that we will lower our standards, whether consciously or not. And while data from across the country shows that pass rates remain pretty stable in post-AB705-like situations, this assumes that the students have been appropriately supported.

But how would we know if we’re appropriately supporting students if we lower our standards in order to skew our pass rates? We wouldn’t be able see if (or, more likely, how) we need to improve our support. No one can fix a problem (nor celebrate successes) with skewed data.

We want to make sure there are no incentives that work against that. And demanding that instructors justify their pass rates seems a particularly bad incentive.

Let me know if you have any questions about any of this. I’d be happy to talk about it.

Some thoughts on ENGL 10

This semester, a number of faculty will be teaching the ENGL 1A + ENGL 10 for the first (and last) time, and I’ve gotten a few questions about it. So here are a few thoughts.

ENGL 10 was a stop-gap measure, responding to requirements from AB 705 while we worked to get a five-unit course (ENGL 1E) through curriculum and articulation. That course will replace 1A/10 next fall.

That’s not to say ENGL 10 is a bad thing; the “co-req model” is one of the most recommended strategies for offering support for students. But there are a few quirks that you’ll want to be aware of, if you’re teaching it:

  • Since we aren’t allowed to split up a one-unit course, it’s created a somewhat awkward schedule: MW classes have two hours on M and three hours on W; TTh classes have three hours on T and two hours on Th.
  • Since ENGL 10 is a separate course, it needs its own syllabus, even if (as many do) you choose to treat the 1A/10 pair as a single course. (Here’s a sample syllabus (PDF) from Kiara’s ENGL 10 from this semester.)
  • Since it’s a separate course, it also means you’ll need to grade it separately. ENGL 10 is Pass/No Pass, though, so this is largely a formality ; P/NP doesn’t affect a grade point average, and has no effect on their ability to move on to 1B or 1C. (I don’t recommend you tell your students this, though; the grade-grubbers might decide it’s not worth their time.)

The course was designed to offer the greatest flexibility for instructors to meet the needs of their students. The Course Outline of Record (PDF) says:

Based on ongoing instructor assessment of student needs, students will work on some of the following:

The key really is to adjust to the students–the specific students you have, in your specific class, on that particular week.

I’ll quote some advice from a couple instructors, but first I want to say something quick about who the students are.

AB 705 required that we change our placement policies. We settled on the following (this is simplified, since not all students come to the college with a high school GPA, but it’s good enough for this discussion):

  • High school GPA of 2.6+ — directly into ENGL 1A. That’s about 75% of the students.
  • HSGPA 1.9-2.6 — we recommend they take ENGL 1A with ENGL 10. This is about 22% of the students.
  • HSGPA <1.9 — we requires they take ENGL 1A + 10. This is about 3% of the students.

This means that we should expect a wide range of students (in terms of preparation, skill, and maturity) in all the ENGL 1A classes. And–in theory, at least–that distribution should skew a bit toward the unprepared side of the bell curve for the ENGL 1A/10. However, in practice, it seems–at least anecdotally–that there isn’t necessarily a huge difference between them. Thus the need for flexibility.

So here are some thoughts that Shawn and Carrie sent me. Much of what is here is valuable advice for both 1A and the 1A/10 combo, though Carrie’s suggestion relates more to the latter. And many of them have been touched on, or even more deeply explored, in the Community of Practice meetings (which everyone is welcome to attend!). And even if you can’t make the meetings, we encourage you to sign up for the community’s Canvas presence (you should have received an invitation from Shawn earlier in the semester); you could still follow along with the readings, and even participate in the discussion forum.

So here’s what Shawn wrote:

Here are a few things that come to mind, but it is not exhaustive. 

  • Create a comfortable, safe learning community
  • Help students develop a positive reader/writer identity
  • Explicitly model the cognitive moves an academic reader/writer makes and give time for guided practice in class
  • Model and practice pre, during, and post academic reading strategies
  • Make metacognitive conversations about HOW we read and write a routine classroom practice
  • Build in plenty of time for reflection
  • Help students with time management
  • Use “Just in time” instruction, instead of front-loading via lecture
  • Growth Mindset grading
  • Allow plenty of time for low-stakes collaborative practice and formative, timely assessment before high-stakes, summative assessment
  • Work to differentiate instruction and activities when possible
  • Don’t assume technological expertise–try to take them to the computer lab to help them learn how to navigate Canvas and create documents that meet academic conventions.

And Carrie added this helpful suggestion:

I think the one thing I would add to Shawn’s list is to not plan 10 too strictly. 

At the beginning of the semester, I used the “10 hour” for student success instruction (like drawing up a homework planner, or digital literacy exercises). As the semester has progressed, I’ve used the 10 hour to “balloon out” time for specific tasks that I know are going to take my 1A/10 students longer, like reading and discussion routines. Tomorrow, for example, I’m going to devote part of the 10 hour to a research exercise that my 1A students pulled off in an hour today– I know my 1A/10 students are going to need more time to process, discuss, and make decisions.

So, the point being: figure out a way to make 10 adaptable, even week-to-week. 

I’ll just conclude by repeating an important point: Though ENGL 10 gives the time and space to incorporate many of these strategies, all of our ENGL 1A courses now are likely to included students who might not have been in our classes before, and we need to adjust to that reality. And many of the things that we can do in our ENGL 10 can also be applied in our ENGL 1A classes more generally–indeed, many of them should be.

If this post raises any additional questions, or if I was unclear about any of the issues, and so on, feel free to contact me at gkemble@yccd.edu.

Notes from English Dept. Meeting of 9/3/19

College Information Day

As we’ve done in the past, the English Dept. has volunteered to set up a table on College Information Day. The event is September 19, from 10:00-1:00. We need two things:

  • Volunteers for the table. Please let me know (gkemble@yccd.edu) what times you can be there. (In the past, people have signed up for at least an hour at a time.)
  • Stuff to show off. In the past, we’ve displayed textbooks and anthologies, flyers about the English program in general, flyers about specific programs (e.g., Flumes, the student publication). Students especially like to see work that our instructors have published, so please drop off a copy of any work you’ve had published.

Scheduling for Spring 2020

The process:

  • I’ve sent out the Part-Time Staffing Survey for Spring 2020. If you are a part-timer, look for the email with the link to the survey. (If you did not get the email, you can use the link above–but please also let me know, so we can hunt down why you didn’t get the email.)
  • At the same time, I’m finalizing a couple of minor issues with Walter.
  • Then we’ll reserve classes for the cohorts (Puente, First-Year Experience)
  • Then, full-timers will sign up in order of seniority. We’ll use One Drive for this.
  • Then I’ll work on the jigsaw puzzle of scheduling part-timers. That earlier-mentioned email explains more about how that works. (Again, if you didn’t get that email, let me know.)

We also discussed the possible need to increase the number of ENGL 1B and/or 1C courses, given the increased number of ENGL 1A courses. We’re flying blind, but David Perez (the counselor assigned to our dept.) suggested we poll our students later in the semester to see how many of them plan to sign up for 1B or 1C. I’ve made a note to myself to figure out how to coordinate this.

Curriculum Update Work

I sent out a document outlining some work that we need to do with our curriculum and degrees. You can refer to that for details. There are some minor additions to it, but the most significant info involves assigning the work to update the curriculum. (If your name is not on here, but you want it to be, please contact the people whose names are there; I’m sure they’d appreciate the help.)

  • 1B and 1C – Cassandra and Kyra
  • 30A and B – Condrey (he has asked for someone to join him)
  • 31A and B – Kiara
  • 34 – Condrey (it’s pretty much done)
  • 36 – Condrey and Zack (also pretty much done?)
  • 40A and B – Kiara and Shawn
  • 46A and B – Jukes and Carrie

As was noted in the meeting, our curriculum is in pretty good shape. We don’t expecting that revisions will need to be extensive. We just need to be sure that the curriculum is clean — that textbooks are up-to-date, all fields are filled in, that courses aligned with C-ID are still aligned, etc.

That’s it for now

We ran out of time before we got to the Program Review information, but I don’t expect to have some of the data we asked for until the next meeting anyway.

Speaking of the next meeting: please mark your calendar for September 17.

English Department: A few announcements of varying importance (email)

Here’s an email I sent out July 24, 2019. The title of the post is the subject line of the email. And here are the three attachments:

Hi all,

The Fall semester is (too) fast approaching, so I thought I’d send out an email with some of the more important things that all y’all should know. There’s a lot here, but I’ve tried to keep it brief. Please read the whole email, and mark your calendars as appropriate.

New English 1A course description

Many of you may remember that we recently revised the Course Outline of Record (COR) for English 1A. If you are teaching 1A this Fall, please make sure that your syllabus uses the new course description, as that’s what will appear in the new college catalog.Here’s the new course description: 

Course Description

An introductory course offering instruction in expository and argumentative writing, appropriate and effective use of language, close reading, cogent thinking, research strategies, information literacy, and documentation. Focus on the recursivity of writing processes and integrating reading, writing, and speaking skills. Students will write a minimum of 6000 words.

I’ve also attached a PDF of the COR to this email [Update: see link above], as the old COR is still the one listed as “Active” in META (I expect that will change as the semester begins….). [UPDATE: The new course is now listed as Active]

SLOs to be assessed for Fall 2019

At the end of last semester, we selected which SLOs we would be assessing for the Fall for each of the composition courses. For ENGL 1A and 56, we chose to assess a different SLO from last year. For ENGL 1B and 1C, we’ll be assessing the same SLO we did last year.

I’ve attached a PDF of the SLOs for each course [Update: see link above]; the bold-and-underlined SLOs are the ones we chose for this semester. Note that the format for this list looks a lot like earlier versions, so be sure you use this one. (I added the dates this time, so that should help.)

Spring 2019 SLO results

I’ve attached a PDF of the results of the SLO assessments from Spring [Update: see link above] . Early in the semester–possibly during our pre-semester SLO meeting or, more likely, during one of our first department meetings–we’ll want to have a discussion about what we can learn from these results.

Of course, they don’t mean a lot on their own, but I’m not sure what all we’d like to see to put them in context. So: please let me know what information you would like me to gather to help us make meaning of these results.  I have a couple ideas, but  your insights on that would help a lot.

Pre-semester SLO meeting

When we stopped holistic scoring, we agreed to meet before and after the semester to discuss SLOs. This semester, our convocation week activities include campus-wide work on outcomes, though I believe we’ll be focusing our attention on program outcomes. Since that’s a different focus than course SLOs, we’ll still need to meet as a department to talk about SLOs and assessments.

Please join us Friday, August 16, from 12:00 – 2:00 pm, in Room 1171 (the journalism lab) for that discussion.

Note that this is a paid meeting for part-time faculty.

Readers Apprenticeship and AB 705 Professional Development

As announced last May, we’ll be offering a professional development series, starting in the fall, to support us as we adjust to the fallout of AB 705. (Here’s a link to the email that announced the series, with the schedule and an explanation of compensation for part-time faculty. (You’ll just need to ignore the first item, “Face to face meeting 1,” which happened in May.)

Next up in that series is a two-day Readers Apprenticeship workshop on August 8 and 9. We’re offering up to 10 stipends ($900) for part-time faculty to attend the workshop, and I believe there are still stipends available. (The stipends will require attendance and a “making it real” assignment.) Here’s a link to the email that announced the workshop, which includes a link to short (2.5 minute) video explaining RA, as well as links to the forms for registering and for applying for the stipend.

Department Meetings

Last year, we decided to meet twice per month. Those meetings are scheduled from 12:00-12:50 on the second and third Tuesdays of each month. For now, we’ll meet in Room 1171 (the journalism lab). 

Our first meeting will be Tuesday, August 20. (I’m not counting the Convocation Week Division/Department meeting, which I believe is scheduled for Thursday, Aug. 15, at 2:00.) I know that many faculty teach class at that time or aren’t on the Yuba campus on those days, but everyone who is able to attend is welcome.

Questions?

Let me know if you have any questions about any of this.

See y’all soon,

Greg Kemble

English Composition Coordinator

Email announcing the Readers Apprenticeship Workshop

Here’s an email that Kristina Vannucci sent on behalf of the Staff Development Committee on May 15, announcing the RA workshop:

Hello wonderful colleagues,

Save the date for this exciting professional development opportunity!

What? Yuba College Reading Apprenticeship 2-day workshop! Check out this 2.5-minute video to find out what this interactive workshop will cover—it’s about a lot more than reading.

Why? Participate in professional development that can have a transformative impact on teaching and learning.Deep, research-based professional learning can help carve the path towards equity and social justice.

When and where? August 8th and 9th from 8:30-4:30 in the Yuba College Library on the Marysville Campus

Who should attend? Faculty and instructional staff from all disciplines are encourage to attend—administrators are also welcome to participate!

Cost? Free for all Yuba College faculty, instructional staff, and tutors

Can I get paid for attending? Maybe!

  • FLEX: Faculty can use the hours for FLEX, as long as you do not receive a stipend as outlined below.
  • Stipends for part-time faculty: There are a limited amount (10) of stipends for part-time faculty who meet attendance and participation requirements. Priority will be given to Math, ESL, and English instructors who will be teaching in the fall (due to AB 705 mandated placement changes). If you would like to apply for a stipend, please use this form.

How do I register? Space is limited—so sign up as soon as possible by filling out this form.

Questions? Contact Kristina Vannucci or Shawn Frederking for more information

kvannucci@yccd.edu

sfrederk@yccd.edu

On Behalf of Staff Development, 

Kristina Vannucci

Email regarding AB 705 Professional Development

Below is the text from an email (actually two, since I messed up on one) that I sent to English faculty on May 8. This is the corrected version:

Subject: AB 705 Professional Development (first meeting next week!)

Hello English Instructors,

As promised, we have set dates for English faculty AB 705 professional development! The aim of these interactive meetings is to support you as you support your students. Participants will have opportunities to trouble-shoot and share knowledge and experience, and we will also try out strategies and routines we can use to support students in the classroom. You may participate as much—or as little—as you like. Compensation for your time is outlined below.

Stipends will be offered to part-time faculty who meet the stipend requirements (this involves minimum hours and developing an artifact to share). Stipends will be based on the average part-time instructor hourly wage: $65 an hour (as you know, this amount includes prep time). We will send out a stipend application form with all the details soon.

Full-time faculty can use the hours for FLEX. Or, you can apply for advancement on the salary schedule, as outlined in this HR document about “professional growth“. If you do the latter, keep in mind that you need to file this paperwork ahead of time, and you will need to follow up with more documentation after the PD series is complete.

Here are the dates—mark your calendars!

Meeting 1 Fri, 5/17–1-3 pm Face to face meeting  1
Thurs and Fri, 8/8-8/9 from 8:30-4:30 each day.Reading Apprenticeship 2-day Workshop.Note: A limited number of $900 stipends (10) will be paid to part-time faculty for attending this workshop and completing a “making it real” assignment. This is separate from the English PD stipend because they will be offered to part-time faculty across disciplines. Make sure to register early (watch your e-mail) and apply for a stipend, if you are interested. English, Math, and ESL instructors who will teach classes in Fall 19 will be given priority.
 Evening of Fri 8/8Reading prep for 2nd day of workshop (post online before day 2)
Meeting 2 Fri, 8/23 from 9-11Face-to-face meeting   2
  Reading prep for meeting 2 (post online before meeting)
Meeting 3 Fri, 9/6 from 9-11  Face-to-face meeting 3
  Reading prep for meeting 3 (post online before meeting)
Meeting 4 Fri, 9/27 from 9-11Face-to-face meeting  4
  Reading prep for meeting 4 (post online before meeting)
Meeting 5 Fri, 10/18 from 9-11Face-to-face meeting  5
  Reading prep for meeting 5 (post online before meeting)
Meeting 6 Fri, 11/15 from 9-11Face-to-face meeting 6
  Reading prep for meeting 6 (post online before meeting)
Meeting 7 Fri, 12/6 from 9-11Face-to-face meeting  7

Scheduling Update

I sent out an email announcing the results of the survey (re: scheduling the 1-hour co-requisite course) and pointed here for further information about the survey results, as well as responses to a handful of the comments.

The decision

As I said in the email, we’ll be scheduling the co-req (ENGL 10) on the first day of each pair (Monday for MW classes, and Tu for TTh classes).

Survey results

Of the 21 who answered:

  • 11 (52.4%) saw no difference or had no preference
  • 7 (33.3%) preferred the first-day option
  • 3 (14.3%) preferred the second-day option

The comments offered solid reasons for both first- and second-day options, so I followed the 7-3 vote for those who had a preference.

In response a few of the comments

I wonder if students might have a preference…

Ideally, we’d have had time to try to find this out, but we learned about the need to schedule the co-req on a single day just last week, and we’re already late with the schedule. (I’m also not sure how to get that kind of question out to students.) We might want to coordinate asking our students during the fall semester — but see the next point.

I think this is a scheduling nightmare for both faculty and students, so either way, it’s not ideal.

and

I’ll be happy when/if we can get the 5-unit 1A in place, and the time can be split across both meetings.

Yes, it is a scheduling nightmare, and yes, I really hope we can get a 5-unit 1A to articulate this year, so that this mess ends up being temporary (two semesters, at most). This is in progress, but it takes time.

I’m mainly curious how this will affect part-time scheduling, and if part-timers will have to stay on campus longer with breaks, which might affect their availability. If we are required to have office hours on the “longer” day and are teaching 2 sections for 6 hours that day, that puts us on campus for longer than some of us are used to (and with travel time, it might be an issue).

I don’t see any way that this can not affect part-time schedules. In fact, in addition to this new ENGL 1A+10 set up, we’re also increasing the number of ENGL 56 sections, which are also 5-unit courses (just without the staggered scheduling). That will also create challenges. As always, I will do my best to minimize the number of preps and the length of time between courses. But the complexity of the schedule and the requirements of the contract also play into that jigsaw puzzle.

That said, there are two potential benefits here: first, it will be possible to get the 20-unit maximum units per year with only 4 courses, rather than 5. Second, at least in the case of the staggered 1A+10, a part-timer could schedule her office hour on the second day (i.e., Mon 9-12, Wed 9-11 + office hour 11-12).

None of that is to deny (as stated in the previous comment) that this will be a scheduling nightmare. But we’ll do the best we can.

What’s next?

I just received the final class schedule for Fall 2019. Once I’ve worked with faculty who are in cohort programs (EOPS First-Year Experience and Puente), full-time faculty will sign up for their schedules. After that, I’ll put together the part-time faculty schedules.

Of course, in preparation for that last step, I’ll need to gather information from the part-time faculty about availability and preferences, etc. I will send that survey out in a separate email, so that (a) it doesn’t get lost in this disaster of an email, and (b) I have time to consider possible changes to the survey so that I can have the best information possible.

Let me know if you have any questions.